Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Query on Indirect Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uery on Indirect Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - sumeet tholle Dated:- 14-3-2016 Last Reply Date:- 17-3-2016 Service Tax<br>Got 5 Replies<br>Service Tax<br>Dear Sir, Good Afternoon. The Dispute Resolution Scheme,2016 applicable if dispute pending before Commissioner(Appeals) as on ist March 2016. In my case, our client received OIO on 25th Jan. 2016 & we have....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... not filed appeal till date. Now my client wish to pay all tax, interest & 25% penalty wants to close the issue. Is my client eligible for scheme if we file appeal now i.e. before end of 60 days ? What is the status of my issue on 14th March 2016 ? Can I say that my issue is pending with Commissioner (Appeals) on 01.03.2016 as it is not pending with Adjudicating Authority ? Pl. reply. Thanks....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Sumeet C. Tholle, CA, Aurangabad Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Sh.Summet C. Tholie, In my views, your client is not eligible as only those cases will be considered which are pending with the Office Of The Commissioner (Appeals) as on 1.3.2016 (as per records of office). However, still rules are to be framed and enacted. There is every possibility of some changes while framing rules. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani: The Reply: Yes I agree with Sri Kasturi Sir&#39;s reply. Even otherwise if you decide to close the case by paying the disputed tax along with interest and penalty the case would be concluded. Thanks. Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji, In this case, the party has crossed period of thirty days from the date of communication of order-in-original....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... They have neither deposited tax along with interest and 25% of penalty nor filed appeal with the Commissioner (Appeals) before 1.3.16 in order to avail the benefit of the Indirect Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016. Though he can file appeal with the Commissioner (Appeals) with in 30 days of the receipt of order. So he has forfeited the benefit of reduced penalty in both ways.Had he filed appealed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....before 1.3.16, he would have got the benefit of reduced penalty in new scheme. Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani: The Reply: Yes Sir I agree with your views. Thanks. Reply By surya narayana: The Reply: Our friends already given the views which does not require any intervention. However, it is too early to think about this in absence of the Rules which are yet be framed or notified. Regards Suryanara....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....yana<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....