2015 (6) TMI 996

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R PER GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER : This appeal, at the instance of the revenue, is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXX, New Delhi dated 15.03.2013. The relevant assessment year is 2009-10. 2. The assessee, an individual, filed her return of income on 30.07.2009, declaring income at Rs. 2,95,400/-. On noticing inadvertent mistake in the return,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the issuance of notice u/s 143(2). Income has been computed by starting with the income as per original return. 3. Aggrieved the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT (A) challenging the jurisdiction of the ITO, Ward 48(1) to frame the assessment also. The assessee vide letter dated 22.02.2013 submitted that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to proceed with the assessment, based o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....complete details of investments in units of Mutual Funds duly supported with copies of statements issued by Mutual Funds and Bank Statements of the assessee and her husband and son. Copies of acknowledgments of their Income Tax returns were also filed. The ld. CIT (A), accepting the assessee's contentions, held that the Income Tax Officer had no jurisdiction to proceed with the assessment on the b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... defective and pleaded that the same be dismissed. 8. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. On perusal of material placed on record, we find that the CIT (A) has decided that the ITO has no jurisdiction to proceed with the assessment on the basis of original return and ignoring the revised return and the CIT (A) has deleted the addition on merits also. The rele....