Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (8) TMI 971

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eturn on 14.10.2010 and determined the Self Assessment Tax Payable for A.Y. 2010-11 on 14.10.2010. Due to severe liquidity crunch affecting the Company, the company was not in a position to pay the tax. There was a huge backlog of Debtors making the cash flow in a negative position. The appellant further submitted that the Debtors Position and Cash/Bank Position enclosed in details, the summary was as follows: (In Lacs) Month end Debtors Available Credit Limit Oct, 2010 3830.07 39.28 Nov, 2010 3907.89 (31.97) Dec, 2010 3852.38 40.08 Jan, 2011 4029.15 17.01 The Pending liabilities which were due in Nov 10 & Dec, 10 are: LC amount ₹ 246.98 Stand by line of credit taken by SBI(term loan due to Nov, 10 &#....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to be made immediately does not transpired any confidence. The appellant had got sufficient funds and the return was filed on 14.10.2010, he could have paid the due tax, however that was not done rather the appellant was trying to settle its dues payable to SBI. Therefore, there is no liquidity crunch and the appellant deliberately chooses not to pay the Self Assessment tax. Under the circumstances, I am of the view that the penalty u/s 221 has rightly been levied by the Ld. AO. The appellant has relied on several case laws which are distinguishable on facts as in almost in all the cases there was a good and sufficient case for not paying the Self Assessment tax which is not the case. Accordingly, the appeal of the appellant stands dismis....