Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (3) TMI 61

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... M.V. RAVINDRAN This appeals is filed by Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal No. 23/2007 dated 28.2.2006. 2. Heard learned A.R. appearing for the Revenue. None appeared on behalf of the respondent-assessee. On perusal of the records, we find that the issue lies in a narrow compass. Accordingly, we take up the appeal in the absence of any representation from the respondent-assessee. 3. The issu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ealt by CESTAT final order 1645/06 dated 03.10.06. I also find that the letter of Sri Lankan Customs authorities relied upon in the show cause notice is the same which is dealt by CESTAT order. The CESTAT vide its impugned order has clearly recorded as under : "On careful consideration and perusal of facts sent by the Sri Lankan Customs to the DD, DRI, which is relied by the Revenue, it is seen ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... exported the tiles. The imposition of Anti-Dumping duty in the present case is not justified and hence, the same is set aside by allowing the appeal with consequential relief, if any.". In view of the above I pass the following order : ORDER 6. I set aside the Order-in-Original No. 149/05 dated 19/20.9.06 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Customs, inland Container Depot, Bangalore and all....