Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (2) TMI 1172

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee was asked to produce the following persons:- 1. Shri Goverdhanbhai Kalabhai Patel. ₹ 3,75,000 2. Shri Pramodkumar J. Jajoo ₹ 1,00,000 3. Smt. Rita P. Jajoo ₹ 1,50,000 4. Shri Jhumerlal Jajoo. ₹ 1,50,000 ₹ 7,75,000 2. The A.O. has recorded the statement and after verifying the confirmation letters, copy of Bank account and copies of the return of Income except in the case of Goverdhanbhai K. Patel the following facts emerge in each case. Mr. Goverdhanbhai K. Patel is an agriculturist. From the Bank account it was seen that account was opened on 7.5.2003 and sum of ₹ 4 lakhs were deposited in cash on 25.2.2003 and on 27.5.2003 and ₹ 2 lakhs each were given by account payee cheq....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the statements of all the persons were recorded. Shri Goverdhanbhai Patel has stated that he was an agriculturist and he was not maintaining books of account. In case of Rituben Jajoo, the A.O. has doubted about the source of deposit. Rituben jajoo is earning the income from sale of dress material. In case of Pramod the cash was deposited and it was from his saving. The learned A.R. submitted that the statement was recorded of all the persons and they have categorically admitted to have advanced from their source of income. The learned A.R. relied upon the decision of Gujart High Court in the case of Dy.CIT vs. Rohini Builders 256 ITR-360. 5. On the other hand, learned D.R. relied upon the order of the Revenue. We have heard the rival cont....