Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 886

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....king the provisions of Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,21,555/- on account of disallowance of depreciation. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the fact that the A.O denied the claim of exemption to the assessee u/s 11 & 12 of the Act." The grounds of appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 are as follows:- "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 67,36,020/- (97,57,240 - 30,21,220 already shown in the income) made by the A.O by invoking the provisions of Section 2(15....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....held that the prime objective of the federation was to promote athletics and sports in India and for this the assessee charges some amount for recognizing the sports events and as such profit making is not the prime object of the assessee. The CIT(A) also taken into consideration the case laws submitted by the assessee and held that the case laws support the case of the assessee to the extent that merely because the assessee receives some recognition fees will not deviate from the fact that the main object of the assessee is the promotion of sports which is apparently for the advancement of general public utility as provided in the sixth limb of Section 2(15) of the Act which defines charitable purposes. Thus the CIT(A) held that the assess....