2009 (3) TMI 1006
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed by the Revenue is whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the order of the first appellate authority granting additional depreciation under s. 32(1)(iia) of the IT Act, 1961. 2. We have heard standing counsel appearing for the appellant. 3. The respondent is a public sector company under Central Government engaged in manufacture and sale of newsprint. The plant in respect of whic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....thing on or after the 1st day of April, 2002; or (B) any industrial undertaking existing before the 1st day of April, 2002, during any previous year in which it achieves the substantial expansion by way of increase in installed capacity by not less than twenty-five per cent." 4. The above provision was later modified dispensing with the requirement of increase in installed capacity as a cond....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....here cannot be any doubt on this proposition there is nothing to indicate that the respondent-assessee cannot sell pulp as a product. The fact that pulp is an intermediary product and is generally consumed captively in the manufacture of newsprint does not mean that pulp is not a product that cannot be marketed by the respondent as and when they desire. There is no dispute that pulp is a marketabl....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI