TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (2) TMI 494
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... CPC) to levy fee u/s. 234E of Rs. 11,535/- as per order passed u/s. 200A. 2. The assessee has duly paid interest on late deduction and late payment of TDS. 3. The assessee filed its TDS return on 16/05/2013. 4. The ld. Assessing Officer appears to have not applied his mind about the late deduction and payment of interest thereon and has issued order relying on report generated by Traces Computerized System. 5. The ld. Assessing Officer has erred by not considering the provision of section 200A which do not authorize the Assessing Officer to levy charges u/s 234E as per the provisions of section 200 and 200A. 6. The return could not be filed within the prescribed time as one TDS challan was paid ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... "4. We have heard the rival contentions, perused the material on record and duly considered facts of the case in the light of the applicable legal position. In addition to his argument on the merits, learned counsel has also invited our attention to the reports about the decisions of various Hon'ble High Courts, including Hon'ble Kerala High Court, in the case of Narath Mapila LP School Vs Union of India [WP (C) 31498/2013(J)], Hon'ble Karanataka High Court in the case of Adithya Bizor P Solutions Vs Union of India [WP No. 6918-6938/2014(T-IT), Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Om Prakash Dhoot Vs Union of India [WP No. 1981 of 2014] and of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia Vs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion (3) of section 206C. (4) The provisions of this section shall apply to a statement referred to in sub- section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C which is to be delivered or caused to be delivered for tax deducted at source or tax collected at source, as the case may be, on or after the 1st day of July, 2012. 6. We may also reproduce the Section 200A which was inserted by the Finance Act 2009 with effect from 1st April 2010. This statutory provision, as it stood at the relevant point of time, was as follows: 200A: Processing of statements of tax deducted at source (1) Where a statement of tax deduction at source, or a correction statement, has been made by a person deducting ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... item, which is inconsistent with another entry of the same or some other item in such statement; (ii) in respect of rate of deduction of tax at source, where such rate is not in accordance with the provisions of this Act; (2) For the purposes of processing of statements under sub-section (1), the Board may make a scheme for centralised processing of statements of tax deducted at source to expeditiously determine the tax payable by, or the refund due to, the deductor as required under the said subsection. 7. By way of Finance Act 2015, and with effect from 1st June 2015, there is an amendment inSection 200A and this amendment, as stated in the Finance Act 2015, is as follows: In section 200A of the Income....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on 234E. While examining the correctness of the intimation under section 200A, we have to be guided by the limited mandate of Section 200A, which, at the relevant point of time, permitted computation of amount recoverable from, or payable to, the tax deductor after making the following adjustments: (a). after making adjustment on account of "arithmetical errors" and "incorrect claims apparent from any information in the statement" - Section 200A(1)(a) . (b) after making adjustment for 'interest, if any, computed on the basis of sums deductible as computed in the statement". - Section 200A(1)(b) 9. No other adjustments in the amount refundable to, or recoverable from, the tax deductor, were permissible in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e, the impugned levy of fees under section 234 E is unsustainable in law. We, therefore, uphold the grievance of the assessee and delete the impugned levy of fee under section 234E of the Act. The assessee gets the relief accordingly." 5. When the above judicial precedent was brought to the notice of the ld . Departmental Representative, he did not have much to say except to place his reliance on the orders of the authorities below. He fairly did not dispute that the provisions accepting levy of late filing fees under section 234E have indeed been brought to the statute w.e.f. 1st June, 2015 and the impugned order was passed much before that date. 6. In view of the above discussions and hearing in mind entirety of the case....