Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 1388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... cross objections wherein, the he has raised the following grounds: 1) Respondent, an individual was a full time Managing Director in M/S Mahavir Packaging (manufacturers of corrugated boxes). In addition to this he was also engaged in activity of trading in Futures and options and also an investor in securities. 2) He was investing in securities since last 4-5 years and consistently showing his income therefrom as either STCG or LTCG as the case may be. The securities were always classified under the head Investments in Balance sheet. This was approved by CIT(A)-II, Nasik in earlier year (A.Y. 2006-07) by accepting the entire gain as capital gain. 3) For A.Y. 2008-09, under the identical facts, the AO accepted the assessee's claim of LTCG to the extent of Rs. 59,41,8197- which implies that she has accepted the assessee's claim regarding holding of investment portfolio. However STCG was treated as Business income by AO. 4) Thus, in view of the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, the dominant purpose of the transactions and the combined effect of various other factors including the case laws cited, the appellant prayed before learned CIT(A)-II, Nasik....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Gopal Purohit wherein it was clearly held that modus operand! of assessee remaining the same, assessee's claim deserved acceptance by following the rule of consistency. 4. The AO-erred in understanding the sale and purchase of appellant under F & 0 segment which comes to 61% and 63% respectively and not 6 % and 8% as alleged. 5. The AO erred in treating the income from securities as business income, despite the fact that the avg. period in case of appellant is 1.5 months (as worked out by AO herself) and as per settled judicial opinion in respect of shares with frequent transactions where shares are held for more than, a month they should be treated as investment and assessable as short term capital gains. 4. During the course of appellate proceedings, the assessee made detailed submissions which are detailed as under: 1. The AO erred in framing the assessment by not appreciating the facts of the case, books of accounts produced and submissions made by the appellant during the course of assessment proceedings. 2. The AO erred in non considering the decision of Hon'ble CIT(A)-II, Nashik for A.Y. 2006-07 in case of appellant under the identical set....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....quarely applicable and the income has to be treated as STCG." Our view also stands fortified by ACIT v. Nashadh V. Vaccharajani (ITA No. 6429/Mum./2009, order dated 25/02/2011) wherein the assessee was also having income from STCG/LTCG, F & O trading & speculative trading and wherein it was held that despite high volume and short period of holding shares gain is STCG and that, on the principles of consistency, a different view cannot be taken on the same facts. 5. The AO erred in understanding the sale and purchase of appellant under F & O segment which comes to 61% and 63% respectively and not 6 % and 8% as alleged. As regards borrowings, the AO failed to appreciate that the appellant have not taken any unsecured loan during 2007-08. On the contrary, he has repaid the loans during the year substantially. Further, appellant has advanced substantial advances during 2007-08 to other parties out of borrowed funds, as can be verified from relevant account extracts. (The relevant table is attached as Schedule-I). This proves the major investment made in shares were from own capital and earning of the year. Without prejudice, the AO erred in concluding that the appellant is trad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the case of Sugamchand C. Shah Vs. ACIT, it is held that sale of shares held for more than one month would be charged capital gains and surplus of shares held for less than one month will be treated as profit from business. AO is directed to work out and compute short term capital gain and business profit accordingly. 6. The same has been opposed before us by the Revenue interalia stated that CIT(A) erred in directing the Assessing Officer to treat profit / gain earned on transaction of purchase and sale of shares held for more than one month as short term capital gain as against treated by Assessing Officer under the head "Business". On other hand, learned Authorized Representative supported the order of CIT(A) on this issue. 7. After going through the rival submissions made by the parties, we find that assessee is an individual along with other activity of dealing in trade of shares. Assessee had shown short term capital gains of Rs. 2,55,08,393/- and long term capital gains of Rs. 59,41,819/- and claimed exemption u/s. 10(38) of I.T. Act on account of trading of shares. Keeping in view of volume of transactions of shares period of holding, intention of assessee, use of bo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ses 96% of the assessee turnover, only 6% of turnover was from F & O account. Details of the same are as under: Particulars F & O Shares Total Opening Stock   1,55,90,055   Purchases 1,99,73,193 (8%) 21,98,99739 (92%) 23,98,72,932 Sales 1,47,78,747 (6%) 23,68,97,231 (94%) 25,16,75,978 Closing Stock   3,29,56,902   Profit/loss (-) 51,94,446 3,43,64,338       The details of availability of funds with assessee were found as under: Opening Balance 43,58,618 Add : Profit 2,63,08,425 Less : Drawings 3,69,296 Less: Income Tax 5,00,000 Closing Balance 2,97,97,747     7.2 From the above, it was found that assessee has its own funds amount to Rs. 43,58,618/- and closing balance of Rs. 2,97,97,747/- including profit of Rs. 2,63,08,425/-. On perusal of balance sheet of the assessee, it was further noticed that the status of loan / borrowed funds was as under: Secured Loan 84,28,485 Unsecured Load 30,27,890 Total 1,14,56,375   7.3 The assess was engaged in frequent purchase and sale of shares which is ev....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  1000   13/12/2007   5000   14/12/2007   2000   20/12/2007     2000 24/12/2007     4000 11/01/2008   2000   14/01/2008   1000   15/01/2008   4000   16/01/2008     10 16/01/2008    500   17/01/2008   1500   18/01/2008      1 21/01/2008      8 01/02/2008     2000 04/02/2008      2000 08/02/2008     4981 11/02/2008     4000  PRITHVI INFO Date Opening stock Purchases Sales 08/10/2007    5000   09/10/2007    9000   11/10/2007     10 16/102007   1000   14/11/2007    5000   15/11/2007     5000 19/11/2007   20000   20/11/2007   5000   23/11/2007   710   26/11/2007   ....