Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nufacturer of tyres, tubes and flaps and also engaged in trading activity of tyres, tubes and flaps and importing the same. As per Notification No. 102/07-Customs dated 14.09.2007, the appellant importer is eligible for refund claim of 4% SAD subject to fulfilment of certain conditions under the said notification. The adjudicating authority rejected their refund claims on the ground of non-fulfilment of conditions stipulated under 2 (b) of the Notification No. 102/07 dated 14.09.2007 read with para 2 (iv) of Circular No. 16/2008 dated 13.10.2008. On appeal the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order of the adjudicating authority. Hence all these appeals. 3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submit that the issue stands se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he genesis of the levy of Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD). While moving the proposal for this levy in the Finance Bill, 1998, the Hon'ble Finance Minister of India stated as follows in his Budget Speech : "I am persuaded about a clear disability that our commodity taxation inflicts on the indigenous goods vis-`-vis the imported goods. While the former are subjected to sales tax and other local taxes and levies, the import sector escapes them by their very nature. In order to provide a level playing-field to the domestic industry, I propose to impose an additional non-modvatable levy of 8% on imports which is approximately equal to the burden of local taxes on domestic producers. This duty should not be viewed as a protecti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d between the two. However, when the imported goods are subsequently sold in the domestic market bearing the burden of local taxes, exemption is provided from SAD so as to neutralize the impact of double levy. This object and purpose of the levy and the exemption needs to be kept in mind while interpreting Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. 5.2 Rule 9 of the CENVAT Credit Rules prescribes the documents on the strength of which CENVAT credit can be taken. An invoice issued by an importer is also one of the prescribed documents. However, for taking the CENVAT credit, under sub-rule (2) of the said Rule 9, following particulars are required to be indicated, namely, details of the duty or service tax payable, description of the goods or ta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resort to any interpretative process would arise only where the meaning is not manifest on the plain words of the statute. As held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the New India Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bihar [AIR 1963 S.C. 1207] - 'it is a recognized rule of interpretation of statutes that expressions used therein should ordinarily be understood in a sense in which they best harmonize with the object of the statute, and which effectuate the object of the Legislature'. Applying the ratio of these decisions to the facts of the case before us, it can be seen that the condition relating to endorsement on the invoice was merely a procedural one and the purpose and object of such an endorsement could be achieved when the duty e....