2016 (2) TMI 305
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenge the order dated 18th June, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 200506. The impugned order relates to Assessment Years 200506. 2. The Revenue has raised the following questions of law for our consideration :( i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h Consulting Pvt. Ltd. (Supra). However, we asked Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the Revenue as to why the present appeal has been filed when the impugned order merely followed the order of the jurisdictional High Court and whether or not the Revenue has filed any appeal from the order of this Court in Black and Veatch Consulting Pvt. Ltd. (Supra) to the Apex Court. We had inter alia obser....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... appeal, if any." 4. Today when the appeal reached, Mr. Tejveer Singh filed an affidavit dated 18th January, 2016 of Mr. Rajkumar, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax 9(3), Mumbai wherein no mention is made about the specific query put in our order dated 6th January, 2016 as to whether any appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the decision of this Court in Black and Veatch Consulting Pvt. Ltd.....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI