Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 295

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessment proceedings u/s 147/148 of the Act purely on the basis of the DVO's report and consequently holding the reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO was invalid." 3. Facts of the case in brief are that the assessee filed his return of income on 31.07.2007 declaring an income of Rs. 15,07,093/- which was assessed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) at an income of Rs. 53,57,090/- on 21.12.2009. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO referred the matter to the DVO u/s 55A of the Act. However, the assessment had to be completed being the time barring matter, without considering the valuation report in respect of the property located at J-6, 1st Floor, NDSE, Part-I, New Delhi and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Singh (2008) 22 SOT 156 (Del.) it was held that assessment cannot be reopened for taxing capital gains in respect of an asset on the basis of its market value as estimated by the DVO. In case of ITO vs. Bholanath Majumdar 137 CTR 198 (Gau), it was held that a valuation report is only an opinion of the valuer. It is further stated, that, the same can neither amount to information nor a reason to believe that any income has escaped assessment. In the context of section 147 as it exists today, the Hon'ble High Court has held that "No Completed Assessments" can be re-opened on thebasis of the valuation report obtained by the Assessing Officer u/s 55A, after that assessment was completed. 5.2 It is a well settled law, that any chal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that as it may, having called for a report of the DVO, the Assessing Officer cannot pass a reassessment order purely on the basis of the DVO's report. This is because at the end of the day, the report of the DVO is only an opinion. Undoubtedly, it is an opinion by an "expert" but it must be collaborated with some other document to justify the re-assessment order. It is for this reason, that the Division Bench of Madras High Court in Commissioner of Incometax vs. V.T. Rajendran (2007) 288 ITR 312 (Mad) has held that purely on the basis of DVO's report reassessment order cannot be passed. This Court is in full agreement with the law cited by the assessee in Commissioner of Income-tax Vs V.T. Rajendran (2007) 288 ITR 312 (Mad) and hold....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 7. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and carefully gone through the material available on the record. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that the reopening was done by the AO only on the basis of the valuation report received from the office of the DVO. On a similar issue the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of ACIT Vs Dhariya Construction Company 328 ITR 515 (supra) held as under: "Having examined the record, we find that in this case, the Department sought reopening of the assessment based on the opinion given by the District Valuation Officer (DVO). The opinion of the DVO per se is not an information for the purposes of reopening assessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assess....