Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (9) TMI 1089

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DER The appellant are manufacturers of HDPE drums chargeable to Central Excise duty. During the period from October 2008 to July 2009, they took Cenvat credit of Rs. 1,01,768/- in respect of MS Angles, Channels, Bars, Plates, Joists etc., which according to them had been used for making Gantry for EOT Crane and also for installation of conveyor for handling of material. The department was of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....asis of Explanation - 2 to Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, according to which the definition of input does not include cement, angles, channels, CTD bars, TMT bars and other items used for construction of factory shed, building, laying, foundation for capital goods, and making supporting structures for capital goods, that firstly, this provision is not applicable, as Explanation 2 had ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l in the case of CCE, Raipur v. Ambuja Cement Eastern Ltd. reported in 2004 (177) E.L.T. 618 (Tri.-Del.), and also the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Mastech Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur-I reported in 2013 (293) E.L.T. 311 (Tri.-Del.). 4. Shri R.K. Verma, the learned Departmental Representative, defended the impugned order by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner (Ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the case of CCE, Tiruchirapalli v. India Cements Ltd. (supra) has held that the cranes with accessories and loaders are machinery and equipment used for production or processing of goods for manufacture of final products, and hence the same would be eligible for Cenvat credit. Since, without Gantry, the EOT crane cannot function the same has to be treated as part of the EOT crane and, hence, in m....