Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 207

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Naveen Mullick, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri M R Sharma, AR ORDER Per: Ashok Jindal: The appellants are in appeal against the impugned orders for limited purpose for reducing the penalty imposed on them under section 112 A and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellants are involved in importation of fire crackers from China which is a restri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....has imposed the penalty of Rs. 2 lakh and Rs.One lakh under section 112 A and 114 AA of the Act respectively. Whereas in all other cases, the penalties on the appellants have been imposed of Rs. 8 lakh and Rs. 5 lakhs under section 112 A and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 respectively. Therefore penalties imposed on the appellant is on higher side and same may be considered to be rational in all ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... goods in the case of Appeal No. C/ 53383/2015, the adjudicating authority has imposed penalty of Rs. 2 lakh and Rs.One lakh under under Section 112A and 114 AA of the Act respectively, which I find is appropriate. Therefore, the penalty imposed on the appellant in Appeal No. C/53383/2015 is upheld. In these circumstances, the appeal No. C/ 53383/2015 is dismissed. 7. Further, I find that in Ap....