Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 84

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unds inter alia that: " 1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in deleing addition of Rs. 1,73,50,000/- on account of depreciation on goodwill. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in deleting addition of Rs. 58, 15,200/- on account of royalty paid. " 2. Briefly sated, the facts of this case are: during the processing of return of income filed by the assessee qua the Assessment Year 2008-09, declaring a loss of Rs. 1,25,40,533/-, the case was subjected to scrutiny and consequently, notices U/S 143(2) and 142(1) along with questionnaire, were served upon the assessee and in response thereto, Mrs. Vandana Gopal Sharda, CA/ AR appeared on behalf of the assessee, filed necessary details. 3. The assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 5. We have heard Ld. Authorized representatives of both the parties, gone through the material placed on record in the light of facts and circumstances of the case and orders of authorities below. 6. Ld. D.R. challenging the impugned order contended inter alia that Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,73,50,000/- on account of depreciation on goodwill and deleting the addition of Rs. 58,15,200/- on account of royalty paid; that since the assessee was having enduring benefit of goodwill and the claim was made for non compete fee, the assessee was benefited so, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the depreciation on 'goodwill. Ld. D.R. relied on the order passed by Assessing Officer. Ld. D.R. relied on t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the business transfer agreement, it has become apparently clear that the assessee company has paid an amount of Rs. 6.94 crores for the purchase of right to use the brand name 'CARYAIR' on the basis of non assignable licence. 10. Now the first question arises for determination in this case is, "as to whether the consideration of Rs. 6.94 crores paid by the assessee for purchase of 'goodwill' is in the nature of intangible asset falling in the classification of assets as per Section 32(1 )(ii) of the Act for the use of trade mark 'CARYAIR'." 10.1 Similar issue arose before Income tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi in the case cited as DCIT Vs Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd. in I.T.A. No. 3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r short). We quote here in below Explanation 3 to Section 32 (1) of the Act: "Explanation 3: For the purposes of this sub- section, the expressions 'assets' and 'block of assets' shall mean; (a) Tangible assets, being buildings, machinery, plant or furniture; (b) Intangible assets, being know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature. " Explanation 3 states that the expression 'asset' shall mean an intangible asset, being know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature. A reading the words any other business or commercia....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....passed on the question of law decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we are of the considered view that there is no illegality or perversity in the findings returned by Ld. CIT(A) hence, ground No.1 is determined against the Revenue. 12. Ground No.2: The assessee has debited an amount of Rs. 58,15,2001- in the P & L account under the head "administrative and other expenses' on the gourd that the same has been paid on account of 'royalty' as per the technical services and licence agreement between and CEIPL under Articles 4 and 6 of the agreement. However, Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of assessee by relying upon the judgement cited as Southern Switch Gear Ltd. V s CIT, 232 ITR 359 by holding that the right to m....