Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (9) TMI 959

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd during the financial year ending 31.3.99 from KIADB. The land is located at No.58, Bommasandra, Bangalore. The HUF had disclosed this fact in the return filed by it for the assessment year 1999-2000. It is further submitted the HUF constructed a factory building during the financial year 2003-04 and let it out to M/s Quest Technologies. 2.1 The rental income was disclosed in the return filed by HUF for the asst. year 2004-05 and 2005-06. The PAN of HUF is AAAHM8739G. M/s Quest Technologies had deducted tax at source on the rent paid. While issuing TDS certificate the tenant quoted the PAN of the assessee-individual. 2.2 The assessee's case was selected for scrutiny for the asst. year 2005-06. The learned AO noticed the discrepancy in P....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hands of assessee-individual just because the tenant has wrongly quoted the PAN of the assesseeindividual instead of PAN of HUF. (4) That the learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in holding that the rental income is to be assessed in the hands of assessee-individual as no rental income has been disclosed in respect of property no.58 in the return filed by HUF for assessment year 1999-00 ignoring the fact that the factory building was constructed in 2003-04 and let-out from assessment year 2004-05 onwards. 3. The learned AR reiterated the stand taken before the authorities below. He also produced statement of income of HUF for the asst. year 2004-05 and 2005-06, wherein the HUF had declared rental income received from plot No.58, Bomma....