2009 (9) TMI 959

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itted that the HUF had purchased land during the financial year ending 31.3.99 from KIADB. The land is located at No.58, Bommasandra, Bangalore. The HUF had disclosed this fact in the return filed by it for the assessment year 1999-2000. It is further submitted the HUF constructed a factory building during the financial year 2003-04 and let it out to M/s Quest Technologies. 2.1 The rental income was disclosed in the return filed by HUF for the asst. year 2004-05 and 2005-06. The PAN of HUF is AAAHM8739G. M/s Quest Technologies had deducted tax at source on the rent paid. While issuing TDS certificate the tenant quoted the PAN of the assessee-individual. 2.2 The assessee's case was selected for scrutiny for the asst. year 2005-06. The ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the rental income is to be assessed in the hands of assessee-individual just because the tenant has wrongly quoted the PAN of the assesseeindividual instead of PAN of HUF. (4) That the learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in holding that the rental income is to be assessed in the hands of assessee-individual as no rental income has been disclosed in respect of property no.58 in the return filed by HUF for assessment year 1999-00 ignoring the fact that the factory building was constructed in 2003-04 and let-out from assessment year 2004-05 onwards. 3. The learned AR reiterated the stand taken before the authorities below. He also produced statement of income of HUF for the asst. year 2004-05 and 2005-06, wherein the HUF had declare....