Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (9) TMI 958

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....48.66 lakhs on account of warranty inclusive of provision for warranty of ₹ 241.33 lakh. The Assessing Officer observed that since the assessee had not furnished any material to show the actual working of provision, the amount of ₹ 241.33 lakh was not allowable. This disallowance was confirmed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Subsequently, the Tribunal restored the issue to the file of Assessing Officer with the directions that the basis for disallowed amount should be ascertained after seeking clarification regarding the figures. 3. The Assessing Officer as directed by the tribunal examined the matter. The assessee vide letter dated 12.12.2006 submitted that the calculation of provision for warranty had been made @....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was submitted that the assessee had recurring liability of warranty to the extent of un-expired portion of warranty period. The assessee followed the consistent method of providing for warranty liability which was in line with the mercantile system of accounting being followed by the assessee thereby the expenses and income were to be matched, to correctly reflected the cost of goods sold and liability in respect of aforesaid amount accrued immediately on sale of goods. Provision for warranty was made on scientific method after considering the actual sale and actual warranty claimed during the three years immediately preceding assessment year 2002-03. Ld.AR of the assessee placed reliance on the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the cas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er hand, Ld.AR of the assessee submitted that provision for warranty was made on the basis of claims received by the assessee for last three years. 7. We have heard both the parties and gone through the material available on record carefully. In the case before us, the assessee has been making provision in respect of warranty on the basis of past history of the case. The assessee had also provided additional warranty in respect of heavy commercial vehicle and warranty for concord (motor parts replacement). The estimation of liability for warranty is based on past history of the case. Therefore, the issue is covered squarely by the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bharat Earth Movers (supra) wherein Hon'ble Apex Court h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (c) a reliable estimate can be made of an amount of the obligation. If these conditions are not met, no provision can be recognized. The principle is that if the historical trend indicates that a large of number of sophisticated goods were being manufactured in the past and the facts show that defect existed in some of the items manufactured and sold, then provision made for warranty in respect of such sophisticated goods would be entitled to deduction from the gross receipt u/s 37" 8. From above decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court, it is clear that provision for warranty has to be estimated on scientific method. In the case before us, the assessee had e....