Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2013 (12) TMI 1551

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....- 615, 1716 of 2006 - ORDER NO. FO 58544-58562 /2013-EX(SM), FO 58658/2013<br>Central Excise<br>Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) Shri R.K. Mishra, AR for the Appellant Shri O.P. Agarwal and Shri Udit Jain, Advocates for the Respondent JUDGEMENT Per Archana Wadhwa: All the appeals filed by the Revenue are being disposed of by a common order as the issue involved is identical. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....seen that such proceedings initiated against the respondents were dropped by the original adjudicating authority. The Revenue challenged the said order before Commissioner (Appeals), who rejected the appeals filed by the department by observing that the issue stand covered by the Boards circular No. 243/77/96 dated 3.9.96 and Tribunals decision in the case of Mangal Textile Mills (I) Pvt. Ltd. v....

PrevPreviousNextNext