Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (1) TMI 768

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1 Access Media 11 2 Web hosting services 51 3 Forum services 59 4 Online services 13 5 Enterprise services 12 6 Cyber Café 15 7 International Business 16 8 Technology 31   TABLE-B Exempted Services Sl. No. Name of the SBU Code No. 1 Software dev & E-learning 53   TABLE - C Accounting /support services or common services received Services Sl. No. Name of the SBU Code No. 1 Finance 32 2 Human Resource 33 3 Administration 34 4 Corporate 35   3. Relying on the above 3 tables, it is submitted by Appellant that the 8 departments tabulated in Table-A provide taxable services. That is undisputed by the Revenue. The service department tabulated in Table-B does not provide any taxable service but provides exempted service. The service departments tabulated in Table-C above receive the service as input for their use and allocates credit of input tax to the departments appearing in Table-A and Table-B. 4. Appellant submits that so far as the extent of input service credit earned by Table-C departments is concerned when that was allocated to the departments in Table-A that has been questioned by the Revenue on the ground....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as well as exempted goods or services, then, the manufacturer or provider of output service shall maintain separate accounts for receipt, consumption and inventory of input and input service meant for use in the manufacture of dutiable final products or in providing output service and the quantity of input meant for use in the manufacture of exempted goods or services and take CENVAT credit only on that quantity of input or input service which is intended for use in the manufacture of dutiable goods or in providing output service on which service tax is payable.  (3)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rules (1) and (2), the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service, opting not to maintain separate accounts, shall follow either of the following options, as applicable to him, namely :- (i) the manufacturer of goods shall pay an amount equal to ten per cent of value of the exempted goods and the provider of output service shall pay an amount equal to eight per cent of value of the exempted services; or (ii)the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service shall pay an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit attributable to inputs and input ser....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....VAT credit taken on inputs during the month minus A;  (iii) the amount attributable to input services used in or in relation to manufacture of exempted goods or provision of exempted services (provisional) = (E/F) multiplied by G, where E denotes total value of exempted services provided plus the total value of exempted goods manufactured and removed during the preceding financial year, F denotes total value of taxable and exempted services provided, and total value of dutiable and exempted goods manufactured and removed, during the preceding financial year, and G denotes total CENVAT credit taken on input services during the month;  (c) the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service, shall determine finally the amount of CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods and exempted services for the whole financial year in the following manner, namely:-  (i) the amount of CENVAT credit attributable to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture of exempted goods, on the basis of total quantity of inputs used in or in relation to manufacture of said exempted goods, denoted as H;  (ii) the amount of CENVAT credit attributable to inputs used fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etermined provisionally as per condition (b), (ii) CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods and exempted services for the whole financial year, determined as per condition (c), (iii) amount short paid determined as per condition (d), alongwith the date of payment of the amount short-paid, (iv) interest payable and paid, if any, on the amount short-paid, determined as per condition (e), and (v) credit taken on account of excess payment, if any, determined as per condition (f);  (h) where the amount equivalent to CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods or exempted services cannot be determined provisionally, as prescribed in condition (b), due to reasons that no dutiable goods were manufactured and no taxable service was provided in the preceding financial year, then the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service is not required to determine and pay such amount provisionally for each month, but shall determine the CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods or exempted services for the whole year as prescribed in condition (c) and pay the amount so calculated on or before 30th June of the succeeding financial year.  (i) where the amo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Rs. 1,11,07,075/- is that the department in Table-B of appellant availed part of the cenvat credit earned by the department in Table-C. 9. A bare reading of sub-rule (2) and sub-rule (3) of the CCR 2004 makes clear that sub-rule (3) contains overriding provision which is independent in its nature irrespective of anything stated in sub-rule (1) and sub-rule (2) of CCR 2004. When sub-rule (2) is read that throws light that appellant has chosen a way of maintaining its record which enabled it to substantially allocate the cenvat credit of service tax suffered by the departments in Table-C and partly to the department in Table-B. It has complied to the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6. Once the conduct of the appellant in the manner indicated by the material facts stated above is very clear because of the proportionality of the credits allocated, due to its division of the department and maintenance of records, there cannot be any presumption by Revenue that the appellant's case falls under Rule 6 (3) of CCR 2004. It is also apparent from record that the order passed by the Authority below is unreasonable for the reason that as against credit of Rs. 6,66,423/- allocated to t....