2007 (6) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (Appeals) No. 135/2004(135-A III) CE/DK/Commr(A), dated 8-12-04. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows: (a) The appellant, a manufacturer of beverages, found certain quantity of their finished product not usable and not marketable, and hence sought permission for destroying the same. (b) The remission of duty of Rs. 4,45,573/- on the finished goods was g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Cenvat credit which was 7-9-00. (e) The original authority denied the claim of refund on the ground that the amount was reversed towards the Cenvat credit as condition of availing remission under Rule 49 of Central Excise Rules, 1944. (f) The Commissioner (Appeals) concurred with the order of the original authority and also held that the appellant has not challenged the order of remission ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....edit in respect of the inputs which has gone into the final product destroyed and for which remission granted need not be disallowed. 5. Learned DR reiterated the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). 6. I have carefully considered the submissions from both sides. The remission of duty on the finished goods has been upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide his order dated 30-7-03. That th....