Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (4) TMI 769

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowing grounds :   "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)-II, Nashik was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 17,91,659/- made on account of claiming expenditure towards amortization of investment held till maturity.   2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)-II, Nashik was justified in confirming the amount of amortization as revenue expenditure.   3. The appellant prays the order of the Assessing Officer may be restored.   4. The appellant prays to adduce such further evidence to substantiate his case.   5. The appellant prays leave to add, alter, clarify, amend and or withdraw any grounds of appeal as and when the occa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntion and added the amount of amortization to the returned income.   3. Matter was carried before the first appellate authority who after considering various contentions raised on behalf of assessee allowed the claim of the assessee. Same has been opposed on behalf of revenue inter alia submitted that CIT(A) was not justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 17,91,695/- made on account of claiming expenditure towards amortization of investment held till maturity and requested to set aside the order of CIT(A) on this issue and restore that of Assessing Officer. On the other hand learned AR supported the order of CIT(A).   4. After going through rival submissions and material on record we find that with the advent of section 80....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ilities) carried on by a co-operative society with its members shall be included in the definition of 'income' (with effect from 1st April, 2007)".   6. Cooperative bank unlike other commercial banks are subjected to dual control from both RBI as well as from state cooperative department. The accounting treatment for a cooperative bank is therefore a result of guidelines from both the controlling authorities. Ordinarily a deduction is not available to an assessee unless specifically provided under the Act. This is irrespective of accounting treatment provided by the assessee in its books of accounts. But at the same time it was well settled that deduction expressly mentioned under the Act are not exhaustive and profit is to be deriv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....008, on 'Assessment of Bank - check list for deduction', states as under:   "As per RBI guidelines dated 16th October, 2000, the investment portfolio of the banks is required to be classified under three categories viz. Held to Maturity (HTM), Held for Trading (HFT) and Available for Sale (AFS). Investments classified under HTM category need not be marked to market and are carried at acquisition cost unless these are more than the face value, in which case the premium should be amortised over the period remaining to maturity. In the case of HFT and AFS securities forming stock in trade of the bank, the depreciation/appreciation is to be aggregated scrip wise and only net depreciation, if any, is required to be provided for in the ac....