Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (5) TMI 922

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur this appeal has been filed. The questions raised before this Court are as follows : "1. Whether the High Court is right in laws and on the facts of the case in dismissing the appeal of the revenue ? 2. Whether the High Court has failed to consider the following substantial questions of law : (A)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... findings of the ITAT allowing the depreciation on research and development assets which related to the closed business of Fast Food Division/Unit of the assessee-company as such not used during the previous year ? (D)Whether in the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in affirming the findings of ITAT deleting the disallowance of ₹ ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....992-93 which are the subject-matter in Civil Appeal No. 3511 of 2007 and Civil Appeal No. 2939 of 2006, our answers to the questions given in relation to section 43B and depreciation on research and development machinery and replacement of transformers shall apply to the facts of the present case also. The additional issue here relates to technical service charges. According to learned counsel for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... year 1996-97 it would have been required to pay ₹ 107.323 lakhs as per the old agreement whereas the assessee has during these two years paid ₹ 30 lakhs for each year. The Tribunal and the High Court recorded a finding that the new agreement in April, 1992 was not a subterfuge or clandestine device to reduce the tax liability but was an expenditure incurred on business expediency and ....