Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (10) TMI 1028

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ight:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} AKIL KURESHI AND MS. HARSHA DEVANI, JJ. For the Appellant : Pranav G. Desai ORDER Akil Kureshi, J.  Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal', for short) dated 27-5-2011. For the assessment year 2006-07, the following questions have been presented for our consideration:- "A. Whether in the facts and circumstance....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s and concluded that the Assessing Officer failed to take into account such clarification as well as the decisions of the Apex Court. He was of the opinion that looking to the material on record, it cannot be stated that the assessee was in the business of trading in shares. Revenue, aggrieved by the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), carried the matter before the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's view making following observations:- "4. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and have also perused the material available on record. For the purpose of finding out the nature of transaction as to whether it is an investment or adventure in the nature of trade, one has to see the intention of the as....