AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2015 (1) TMI 1229
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....countant) For the Respondent : Rajnish Yadav (D. R.) ORDER A. K. Garodia (Accountant Member) Both these appeals are filed by the assessee, which are directed against two separate orders of learned CIT(A) - II, Lucknow dated 05/09/2011 for the assessment year 2006 - 07 and dated 19/12/2011 for the assessment year 2007 - 2008. Both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....arned C.I.T.(Appeal - II) Lucknow has erred in confirming assessment order past by the learned I.T.O. without considering facts of appellants Case. 5. That the appellants provides banking facilities to their members/borrowers guidelines Reserve Bank of India as well as other banks. The learned C.I.T.(Appeal - II) Lucknow did not considered the fact of the case. It's unjustified and ag....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pplicable on the appellant bank. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts and in law in confirming the disallowances of Rs. 1,18,94,719/ - made by the Ld A.O. by observing that the deductions u/s 36(1)(viia) of the I.T. Act, 1961 are not available to the appellant bank. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts and in law in not providing the appellant reasonable and sufficient opportunity to hav....