Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (1) TMI 314

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Hearing 06.10.2015 Date of Pronouncement 04.12.2015 on facts, in making an addition of Rs. 6,54,153/- under the head income from house property by ignoring the various facts & evidences etc on record. 2. Whether the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), New Delhi has further erred in law and on facts in enhancing the income from house property by further Rs. 7,88,684/- instead of deleting the addition made to the Returned income of Rs. 6,54,153/- by the Assessing Officer. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Assessing Officer has grossly erred in law and on facts in disallowing the entire business loss as declared by the assessee amounting to Rs. 33,53,751/-. Whether on the facts the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... facts, in making an addition of Rs. 6,54,153/- under head of income from house property by ignoring vital facts and evidence of the assessee. The Ld. Counsel further contended that the Ld. CIT(A) has also erred in enhancing the income from house property by Rs. 7,88,684 instead of deleting the said addition. The Ld. Counsel also placed copy of the order of ITAT "H" Bench, New Delhi dated 23/4/2010 passed in assessee's own case for A.Y 2006-07 in ITA No. 4050/Del/2009 and contended that in the earlier assessment year in the similar set of facts and circumstances and by following the dicta rendered by the Tribunal in the case of JB. Patel & Co. vs. DCIT 312 (AT) 171 (Ahm) allowing the ground of the assessee, it was directed to the A.O to red....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he assessee and it was held by the Tribunal that the annual value of the house property should be assumed at the reduced value i.e. after reducing expenses incurred in providing extra services from rental income. In the present case also, the facts are similar. It is claimed by the assessee that the assessee is providing additional services such as lighting in common areas during working hours, pest control services periodically for all common areas, cleaning services for common areas and security services. The rental income declared by the assessee is composite rental income. The rental income declared by the assessee is composite rental income including charges on account of these additional services being rendered by the assessee. For th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t aside, hence, we hold that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee in principle and thus we follow the same. However, some recalculation is required at the end of the A.O, therefore the A.O is directed to reduce the expenses incurred by the assessee for rendering additional services to the tenants for arriving at annual rental value and thereafter, on such annual rental value, deduction u/s 24 of the Act @ 30% is to be allowed. The issue is restored to the file of the A.O to recompute the income from house property on the same line as directed by the Tribunal order for A.Y 2006-07 (supra). Accordingly, Ground No. 1 & 2 are allowed in the manner as indicated above. Ground No. 3 &4 7. Apropos these ground, the Ld. Counsel of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...../2000 dated 4.9.2003 in which it was held by the Tribunal that the expenses which are necessary for the purpose of maintaining registered office of a company to continue its existence and to comply with the statutory obligations are allowable as business expenditure even if assessee is not carrying out any business activities in the relevant year because these expenditure are incidental to the business activities of the assessee company. In the present case also, we find that these expenses incurred by the assessee are such which are necessary for the purpose of maintaining registered office of a company to continue its existence and also to comply with the statutory obligations and hence the same is allowable as business expenditure and t....