2016 (1) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e ORDER Per : Mr. P.K. Das; These appeals are taken up for hearing as per Order dated 24.02.2005 of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 113 of 2005 (Trade Well Products Company Limited vs. UOI & Others). 2. The Tribunal by Stay Order No. S/29-32/WZB/2004/C-II dated 24.02.2004, directed the appellant to pre-deposit Rs. 1.50 Lakhs. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by Order No. A/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the appellant deposited the amount of Rs. 1.5 Lakhs on 20.04.2005. 3. None appears on behalf of the appellants. Despite issue of notice, there is no application for adjournment. As the appeals are old one, we take up the hearing of all the appeals for disposal. 4. After hearing the learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue and on perusal of the records, we find that the appellant had i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....TH 6310.90. As the goods were cleared as old and used garments, the assessing officer classified the goods under CTH 6309.00 and raised demand of differential duty of Rs. 3,03,093/- alongwith interest. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of duty alongwith interest. By the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjudication order. 5. On perusal of the records, we find th....