2016 (1) TMI 237
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ile processing the statement furnished by the assessee u/s.200A. 3. After hearing both the parties, we are of the opinion that similar issue was considered by this Tribunal in the case of Smt. G. Indhirani and others in ITA No.1019 to 1021/Mds/2015. The Tribunal vide its order dated 10.7.2015, decided the issue in favour of the assessee by observing as follows: "6. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material on record. Section 200A of the Act provides for processing of the statement of tax deducted at source by making adjustment as provided in that Section. For the purpose of convenience, we are reproducing the provisions of Section 200A of the Act:- "200A. (1) Where a state....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....statement" shall mean a claim, on the basis of an entry, in the statement- (i) of an item, which is inconsistent with another entry of the same or some other item in such statement ; (ii) in respect of rate of deduction of tax at source, where such rate is not in accordance with the provisions of this Act; (2) For the purposes of processing of statements under sub-section (1), the Board may make a scheme for centralised processing of statements of tax deducted at source to expeditiously determine the tax payable by, or the refund due to, the deductor as required under the said sub-section. 7. The Assessing Officer cannot make any adjustment other than the one prescribed above in Section 200A of the Act. By Finance....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Assessing Officer to make adjustment by levying fee under Section 234E of the Act with effect from 01.06.2015. Therefore, as rightly submitted by the Ld.counsel for the assessees, while processing statement under Section 200A of the Act, the Assessing Officer cannot make any adjustment by levying fee under Section 234E prior to 01.06.2015. In the case before us, the Assessing Officer levied fee under Section 234E of the Act while processing the statement of tax deducted at source under Section 200A of the Act. Therefore, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the fee levied by the Assessing Officer under Section 234E of the Act while processing the statement of tax deducted at source is beyond the scope of adjustment provided under....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Act. 9. The contention of the assessee can also be examined in the light of the provisions of Indian Penal Code. Section 396 of Indian Penal Code provides for punishment for dacoity with murder. The punishment is imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may be extended to ten years and also liable to fine. For the purpose of convenience, we are reproducing Section 396 of Indian Penal Code, hereunder:- "396. Dacoity with murder - If any one of five or more persons, who are conjointly committing dacoity, commits murder in so committing dacoity, every one of Those persons shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e is a compulsion under the statutory provision. The Parliament welcomes the citizens to come forward and comply with the provisions of the Act by paying the prescribed fee before filing the statement under Section 200(3) of the Act. However, if the assessee fails to pay the fee before filing the statement under Section 200(3) of the Act, the assessing authority is well within his limit in passing a separate order levying such a fee in addition to processing the statement under Section 200A of the Act. In other words, before 01.06.2015, the assessing authority could pass a separate order under Section 234E levying fee for delay in filing the statement under Section 200(3) of the Act. However, after 01.06.2015, the assessing authority is wel....
TaxTMI