Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (2) TMI 1162

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uation of closing stock of polished diamonds of ₹ 1,94,28,535/- and of rough diamonds of ₹ 8,72,083/- totaling to ₹ 2,03,00,636/-. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A), Surat ought to have upheld the order of the Assessing Officer on the above issues. 3. It is, therefore, prayed that the orders of the learned CIT(A) may be set aside and that of the A.O. may be restored to the above extent. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee-firm is doing the business of manufacture and export of diamonds. The assessee imports diamond and after getting the diamond manufactured from outsiders, export the same. The assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2004....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t there are no defects found in the books of account. It is admitted by the Assessing Officer that the final/end product of the assessee-company cannot be of the identical price. Thus, the final/end product is of a varying nature in the terms of colour, clarity, cut and carat. Therefore, it is impossible to have complete result of the production from rough diamonds which are in lacs. In this line of business, the assessee gets the value of closing stock valued by an approved valuer and based on his report, the value is being declared after reducing percentage of Gross Profit thereon. All diamonds are not equal and, therefore, applying the average rate by averaging out the opening stock and the purchases will lead to inconclusive result. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he would have to revalue the opening stock as well and the impact of such revaluation would become visible only thereafter. Thirdly, by making the additions to the closing stock, the AO had enhanced the GP rate to 51.94% which was not only unrealistic but was illogical as well. Therefore, I am of the view that there was simply no basis for rejecting the valuation of the closing stock of polished diamonds which was shown by the Assessee at ₹ 1,94,94,881/-. The AO is therefore, directed to delete the addition of the sum of ₹ 1,94,28,535/-." 4. As regards, valuation of rough diamonds, the Learned CIT(Appeals) held that the assessee has valued such stock on the basis of last purchase in the month of February and, hence, the Assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the last time and not from Assessment Year 2005-06. If the assessee really wants to have benefit, it will artificially increase the value of closing stock, so that the opening of subsequent year is taken at higher figure resulting into less income of subsequent year. The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench "B" in the case of ITO vs. M/s.B.Sureshkumar & Co. by way of ITA No.2632/Ahd/2003, vide order dated 19/12/2007, held that application of average method on the basis of sales bill was not justified. The assessee consistently following such method of valuation of closing stock. This has always been accepted and no defect is found in the same. Therefore, the addition was rightly deleted by the Learned CIT(Appeals). 8. We have heard the rival submissio....