Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (4) TMI 1341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a profit of ₹ 10,30,450/- on account of trading in computer software while it incurred a trading loss of ₹ 3,97,38,050/- on account of trading in shares. According to Explanation appended to Section 73 of the Income-tax Act, the loss in trading in shares is to be deemed as speculation loss. In the quantum proceedings, the assessee's claim of business loss and trading in shares were disallowed and the same was treated as speculation loss and in respect of such disallowance, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. The claim of the assessee is that the assessee never concealed any income nor has furnished any inaccurate particulars of income and disallowance has been made only because of the deeming provision....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hares and furnished all the relevant materials. The AO treated the said loss under Explanation to section 73 as deemed speculation loss and levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The Commissioner (Appeals) cancelled the said penalty holding that the assessee had disclosed all the material facts and it was only under deeming provisions that the loss was to be treated as speculative loss. The Commissioner (Appeals) had cancelled the penalty after considering the facts on merit of the case. He had not cancelled the penalty on the ground of 'wilful' concealment or on the ground of 'mens rea'. Thus, it was opined that the instant case was a simple case of fighting in between duty & rights which automatically did not amount to a case of concealing particu....