2010 (8) TMI 971

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned Standing counsel for the respondents. Against the assessment order dated 26.2.2010 passed for the assessment year 2005-06 imposing tax liability of Rs. 4,04,496/-, the revisionist has preferred an appeal before the Additional Commissioner (Appeal) and the said appeal is pending consideration. In the above appeal on the interim stay applic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eaded in depositing the tax so imposed has not been considered. In support he has placed reliance upon a decision of the Supreme Court reported in 2009 NTN (Vol.39) 126 M/s Pennar Industries Ltd. vs. State of A.P. and others. In the said case the Apex Court has observed that stay application should not be disposed in a routine manner unmindful of the consequences flowing from the order requiring t....