Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (8) TMI 906

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Since, the issues raised are similar, therefore, for facility of reference facts are taken from ITA No. 464 of 2008. 2. The assessee is a contractor undertaking the construction work on contract. The assessee submitted a return for the assessment year 2000-01 declaring the total income of Rs. 8,24,512 in respect of assessment year 2000-01. The Assessing Officer framed assessment on 31-3-2003 after rejecting the claim of the assessee that method of accounting is mercantile and returned a finding that it is cash system. The expenses claimed as per the competition chart were disallowed and added to the income of the assessee. Similarly, the interest and salary paid to the partners were disallowed. In the absence of any documentary evidence,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... "5.34 However, special provisions were incorporated under section 44AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the purpose of quantification of income about civil construction contractors. The minimum flat rate prescribed for determination of income is 8 per cent of gross receipts paid or payable to appellant provided these receipts do not exceed Rs. 40,00,000. These provisions provide for presumptive taxation i.e., presumption of gross receipts and presumption of expenditure during financial year. According to these provisions contained under section 44AD, the appellant cannot claim loss, if any. Hence, if the gross receipts exceed Rs. 40 lakhs. The civil contractors can claim loss which otherwise cannot be claimed by them under section 44AD. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on of the CIT(A), the revenue went in appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue and also rejected the argument raised by the assessee in respect of allowing depreciation claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal returned a finding that where the income has been derived in the case of a civil contractor by applying net profit rate, the assessee is not entitled to depreciation since the same has been assessed by applying net profit rate on the gross receipts. Aggrieved against the said order passed by the Tribunal, the assessee is in appeal under section 260A of the Act, before this Court, raising the following substantial questions of law :- (i) Whether the action of the respondent authorities to....