Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (10) TMI 847

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3,00,000/- (in account of proprietary concern of the assessee, M/s Roots) On 01.04.2008 Rs. 11,024/- (in the account of proprietary concern of 2 ITA-4940/Del/2012 the assessee, M/s Roots) On 23.04.2008 Rs. 1,00,000/- (Loan account of the assessee) On 19.11.2008 Rs. 6,50,000/- (Loan account of the assessee) On 16.02.2009 Rs. 14,50,000/- (Loan account of the assessee) On 16.02.2009 Rs. 10,50,000/- (Loan account of the assessee) On 04.03.2009 Rs. 9,75,000/- (Loan account of the assessee)     ---------------------     Total Rs. 45,36,024/-     --------------------- He, therefore, treated the sum of Rs. 45,36,024/- as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) in the hands of the assessee. 4. At the time of hearing before us, the learned counsel for the assessee contended that none of the above amounts received by the assessee is in the nature of loan or advance which may be treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). We will examine the assessee's contention in respect of each and every alleged loan/advance. 5. Rs. 3,00,000/- and Rs. 11,024/- are debited by DIPL to the account of the assessee under the name and style....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... year for the purpose of applicability of Section 2(22)(e) and if the same amount is adjusted against the transaction of the year under consideration, then, there would be possibly double taxation under Section 2(22)(e). To elaborate, if we see the accounts of the Roots in the books of DIPL, the opening debit balance is Rs. 35,56,505/- which ought to have been considered for the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) in the respective years in which advance was given. If we see the closing balance, it is only Rs. 35,67,529/-. Thus, the variation is only on account of debit of audit fee of Rs. 11,024/- which has been separately considered by us. Except this debit of audit fee, there is no variation between the opening balance and the closing balance. If the sum of Rs. 3 lakhs is considered as deemed dividend, then, despite the total debit balance of only Rs. 35,56,505/-, the amount which would be considered for Section 2(22)(e) would be Rs. 38,56,505/- (Rs.35,56,505 in earlier years and Rs. 3,00,000 in the year under consideration) which cannot be the intention of the legislature. We may also clarify that even if the Department has failed to tax the advance given by DIPL to the assessee ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p; 430   2,00,000.00                    Ch.No.736009 Being cheque recd from                    Harsh Dhir 3-8-2008 Dr        State Bank of India-10886408472        Receipt    453   4,50,000.00                    Ch.No.736811 being ch recd from                    Harsh Dhir 10-8-2008 Dr       KBL-1099                               Receipt   469    2,00,000.00 23-8-2008 Dr       HSBC 5548 5199 9831 6217            &nb....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....            Harsh Dhir 11-10-2008 Dr      State Bank of India-10886408472        Receipt    719   8,00,000.00                    Being Ch recd from Harsh Dhir 8-11-2008 Dr       KBL-1099                               Receipt    829   8,50,000.00                    Being amt Trf from Harsh Dhir 18-11-2008        KBL-1099                              Receipt    864                &nbs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p;             Dhir Amex Card No 03005 29-11-2008 Dr     HSBC 4384-5937-0617-3483           Journal                                     5,228.00                   Being payment made by Harsh                   Dhir on behalf of the company                   Through Ch No 736024 for                   Shilpi Dhir HSBC Card No 6041 5-1-2009 Dr       KBL-1099                        &n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nbsp;              2,94,10,098.00             63,39,535.00          Dr       Closing Balance                                                                   2,30,70,563.00 ----------------------------------------------- 2,94,10,098.00 2,94,10,098.00  9. The sum of Rs. 1 lakh was paid by DIPL to the assessee on 23rd April, 2008. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration, there was no payment made by the assessee to DIPL before this date. Therefore, the sum of Rs. 1 lakh paid by DIPL to the assessee on 23rd April, 2008 is in the nature of loan and advance chargeable as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). The oth....