Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (12) TMI 980

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t, the matter should not have been referred by CIT(A) for valuation as the assessee had already challenged the Juntry Value assessable by the Stamp Valuation authority, before the Nayab Collector and in that case, further reference to valuation is prohibited as per the Act and value determined by Nayab Collector has to be adopted as full value of consideration ?" 2. The issue pertains to valuation of immovable property sold by the assessee during the previous year, relevant assessment year 2007-2008, for sale consideration of Rs. 47 lakhs. Sub-Registrar of Stamp Duty, however, valued the asset in question at Rs. 3.4 crore (rounded off). Assessee carried this valuation in appeal before the Deputy Collector, Stamp Duties. Deputy Collector ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dated 10.4.2015 wherein the Tribunal at para-19 held as under: "10. We find that section 50C(2) provides that where the assessee claimed before the AO that the value adopted or assessed by the stamp valuation authority under sub-section (1) exceeds the fair market value of the property, on the date of transfer, the AO may refer the valuation of the capital asset to the valuation officer, in such a situation, the lower of value determined by the departmental valuation officer and stamp duty valuation officer shall be considered as consideration accruing to the assessee. Since it has not been disputed by the DR that the value of the property determined by the DVO was lower than the value determined by the stamp duty valuation office....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (b) the value so adopted or assessed by the stamp valuation authority under sub-section (1) has not been disputed in any appeal or revision or no reference has been made before any other authority, court or the High Court, the Assessing Officer may refer the valuation of the capital asset to a Valuation Officer and where any such reference is made, the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of section 16A, clause (i) of sub-section (1) and subsections (6) and (7) of section 23A, sub-section (5) of section 24, section 34AA, section 35 and section 37 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (27 of 1957), shall, with necessary modifications, apply in relation to such reference as they apply in relation to a reference made by the Assessing ....