Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (12) TMI 953

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For The Respondent : None Per : B.S.V. MURTHY The respondent had claimed and received refund of unutilized CENVAT credit for 2008-09 amounting to Rs. 40,32,513 comprising of analysis charges, calibration charges, cell phone charges, clearing charges, courier charges, internal audit fee, IT consultancy, labour charges, office maintenance charges, professional and consultancy, repairs &, maint....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... refund of such input services was admissible under rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. b. Comr. of Customs v. Vishal Natural Food Products Bangalore - Final Order No. 382/2011 dated 10/06/2011 of (Tri. - Bang.) [unreported]. In this case, it was held that tax paid on various input services like telephone, professional charges, courier charges, commission paid, clearance & forwarding charge....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... B'lore Vs. Stamen Toyotetsu India Pvt. Ltd. [2011 (23) STR444 (Kar-HC)] b) ITC Limited v. CCE, Hyderabad [(2010) 17 STR 146 (Tri. - Bang)] c) CCE, Nasik v. Cable Corporation of India Ltd. [2008 (12) STR 598 (Tri.-Mum)] d) Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, 2009 (15) S.T.R. 657 (Bom.) e) CCE v. Ultratech Cement Ltd. [2010] 29 STT 244 (Bom.)] d. The Division Bench of the Bombay Hi....