2015 (12) TMI 828

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....haitan,Sr.Advocate JUDGEMENT The appeal arises out of a judgement dated 25th July, 2008 pertaining to the assessment year 2001-02. The question of law suggested by the revenue reads as follows : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in deleting penalty of Rs. 37,23,008 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he facts was on the records, the difference was only regarding the treatment of interest income for the purpose of calculation of deduction U/s.10B of the I.T.Act." The learned Tribunal concurring with the views of the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the revenue. The revenue has come up in appeal. Mr.Agarwal, learned advocate appearing for the appellant reiterated that the income earned from int....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nk were required to be made for the purpose of availing packing credit facility without which the business of the export could not have been continued. The assessee was of the opinion that the interest earned is also eligible for benefit under section 10B. He drew our attention to the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt.Ltd. reported in (2010) 322 ITR 158 (....