2015 (12) TMI 279
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Per M V Ravindran This appeal is directed against -in-Appeal No. PII/AV/36/2011 dated 29-04-2011. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is regarding the service tax liability under the category of "Mining Services", for the period September 2008 to September 2009. Both the lower authorities has come to a conclusion that the appellant had faile....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... appellant should have discharged the service tax liability for the material period and should have checked with the departmental Officers as to taxability of his services. 4. On consideration of the submissions made by both sides, we find that the service tax liability and the interest thereof under the category of "Mining Services" for the period September 2008 to September 2009 is correctly ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tnership firm of farmers and are situated in remote area in Ratnagiri district and may not have had access to the legal opinion as to taxability of the services rendered by them. This can be deduced from the statements recorded by the lower authorities. In our considered view, appellant had made out a case for setting aside the penalties, by invoking the provisions of section 80 of the Finance Act....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI