2015 (12) TMI 260

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Appellant. Shri Anil Gidwani, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER This stay petition has been filed by the appellant with respect to O-I-A No. AHM-SVTAX-000-APP-070-14-15, dated 16-6-2014. 2. Shri Jigar Shah (Advocate) appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that as per the agreement entered between the appellant and M/s. Eugenex Biotechnologies a product 'Cell Clone' was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ax Limited v. CCE, Pune - 2013 (30) S.T.R. 424 (Tri.-Mum.) wherein in a similar situation a complete waiver has been given to the appellant in that case. 3. Shri Anil Gidwani (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that technology has not been transferred to the appellant permanently by M/s. Eugenex Biotechnologies and periodically royalties are to be remitted as per clause 5.4 of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Eugenex Biotechnologies for a period of 7½ years. Prima facie, it appears that transfer of patent right and technology are not permanently transferred to the appellants. However, appellant has relied upon Para 9.1, (reproduced below), of C.B.E.& C. Circular No. 80/10/2004-S.T., dated 17-9-2004 to argue that IPR Services are not attracted to an IPR registered outside India :- "9.1 In....