Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (12) TMI 177

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ss of the assessee. However, tax collected and remitted to the Government has to be forfeited under section 47(2)(b) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act", for short). 2. The facts are not in dispute. The assessee was operating a barge-mounted generator set in Tannirbhavi in the backwaters of Arabian Sea in Mangalore for power generation. Power generated from the barge-mounted generator set was being supplied to the Government of Karnataka under an agreement, up to June 7, 2008, which was not renewed subsequently. The generator set was purchased from M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (for brevity "M/s. BPCL") under fuel supply agreement. On June 7, 2008 when the power generation was stop....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hority", for short) who confirmed the said order. Aggrieved by the said order, a second appeal was preferred to the Tribunal. The Tribunal was called upon to go into the question whether penalty imposed was valid or not ? On the contrary, the Tribunal went into the question whether there was any liability to pay tax at all by the assessee and it came to the conclusion that, as the assessee was not carrying on the business of sale of naphtha and what was sold is solitary transaction and it does not amount to "sale" as defined under the Act. Therefore, it held that there was no tax liability on the assessee. As the assessee collected and remitted the amount to the Government, the Tribunal held that the assessee is not entitled to get back the....