Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (8) TMI 729

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ubhagya Agarwal, Advocate   O R D E R   1. The Revenue is aggrieved by an order dated 21st October, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in ITA No. I.T.(SS) No. 203/DEL/2001 for the block period from 1.4.1988 to 14.10.1998.   2. A search was conducted in premises bearing No. R-304, Greater Kailash- I, New Delhi on 14th October, 1998. The premises was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the Tribunal. Challenging the order of the Tribunal, the Revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the Act.   4. There is no dispute about the fact that documents recovered during the search were in the handwriting of the Assessee's father. For some reason which, learned counsel for the Revenue has not been able to explain, the Revenue did not examine the Assessee&#....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....him. The CIT (A) also found that the documents recovered were not kept in the form of a diary or as an accounts book but were loose sheets of paper and therefore, it was difficult to say that they pertained to amounts paid over and above the amount disclosed in the conveyance deed. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the materials on record, we are of the view tha....