Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (11) TMI 699

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n respect of central excise duty paid on the inputs used in or in relation to manufacture of the aforementioned final product. For disputed period, Central Excise Range Officials verified the records maintained by the appellant and found that cenvat credit has been taken by the appellant based on the invoices issued by M/s Bhagwati Trading Company and M/s Ayushi Steel Company (P) Ltd. Faridabad. Further, investigations carried out in the place of the above suppliers reveal that those suppliers have passed on inadmissible cenvat credit to various manufacturers including the appellants without actually supplying/ delivering the goods. The Jurisdictional Range Superintendent intimated the appellant regarding taking of such irregular credit, an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed from the cenvat credit taken on such input services. He, further submits that the disputed goods have been received from M/s Bhagwati Trading Company & M/s Ayushi Steel Company under proper and valid duty paying documents and that upon receipt of the disputed goods in the factory, the receipt particulars have been duly entered in the prescribed cenvat record i.e. RG-23A Part-I and Part-II register. The Ld. Counsel further submits that the appellant had also maintained other records to prove that the goods have actually been received in the factory. Further, the Ld. Advocate also submits that the payment particulars regarding supply of goods have been duly reflected in the ledger account maintained by the appellant. According to him, sinc....