Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Principal manufacturer eligible to take credit of duty so paid by job-worker

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rincipal manufacturer eligible to take credit of duty so paid by job-worker<br>By: - Bimal jain<br>Central Excise<br>Dated:- 17-11-2015<br><br>Principal manufacturer eligible to take credit of duty so paid by job-worker Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III Commissionerate Vs. Sundaram Auto Components Ltd. [2015 (10) TMI 720 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] The Department has denied credit of duty pai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by job-worker to Sundaram Auto Components Ltd., principal manufacturer ("the Respondent") on the ground that the job-worker had paid duty even when he was not required to pay in terms of Notification No. 214/86-CE dated March 25, 1986. Thus, the Respondent has availed double benefits by claiming credit of duty paid to supplier of inputs & duty paid and collected by job-worker. The Hon'ble High ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Court of Madras relying upon the following judgments: * International Auto Ltd. Vs. Commissioner [2005 (3) TMI 132 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]; * KOHINOOR PRINTERS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., PONDICHERRY [2008 (2) TMI 865 - CESTAT CHENNAI]; * CCE & C Vs. Narmada Chematur Pharmaceuticals Ltd. [2004 (12) TMI 93 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] held that credit of duty paid by job-worker c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an be availed by the principal manufacturer, even if job-worker forgoes exemption and pay duty on semi-processed goods returned to the principal-manufacturer. It was further held that the Respondent did not claim credit twice as it only claimed credit of (a) duty paid to supplier of inputs; and (b) duty paid and collected by job-worker, which, even according to the Department, was not payable by j....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ob-worker. Since duty was paid by the Respondent both times, Cenvat credit was available and same cannot be construed as double benefit by applying theory of unjust enrichment Reply By Vinay Kunte as = Sir Is the credit of Service tax paid by the Job worker will also be available to the principal manufacturer even though the service is exempted u/n no. 25/2012 point no. 30 C if the final produ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct is cleared on payment of Duty? If we apply the logic of unjust enrichment similar to the excise duty paid by the job worker can the service tax paid by the job worker stand the test of law? Dated: 20-11-2015 Reply By Bimal jain as = These all are subjective issues and may be decided as per individual facts of the case..Regards Dated: 30-11-2015<br> Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by authors, experts, professionals ....