2015 (11) TMI 605

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....runa Gupta, Adv., Mr. Jitin Singhal, Adv., Mr. Pratik, Adv. And Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. V. Sridharan, Sr. Adv., Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv., Ms. L. Charanaya, Adv., Mr. Hemant Bajaj, Adv., Mr. T.D. Satish, Adv., Mr. Anandh K., Adv. And Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv. ORDER The issue involved in the present appeal relates to the alleged under valuation of Linear Alkyl Be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....herein for different periods alleging therein that the costing as done by the respondent - assessee was not in accordance with the method of costing and it resulted in under valuation and thus lesser payment of duty. The differential duty was, thus, demanded. The respondent herein, on going through the formula of costing as suggested by the Department, objected to the inclusion of the items of co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7700.00 37700.00 45000.00 (upto December) (1999)       46500 (From January 2000)   The demand was confirmed after considering the reply that was filed by the respondent. The order of the adjudicating authority was challenged by the respondent before the CESTAT. The CESTAT vide its impugned judgment dated 16.06.2005 partly allowed the appeal filed by the respondent. In s....