Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (11) TMI 332

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ended w.e.f. 06.08.2014 of the Central Excise Act 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 is required to be made while filing appeals against order-in-original dated 30.09.2014 when the Show Cause notice in respect thereof was issued before 06.08.2014. 2. The appellant has contended that (i) as per the Kerala High Court judgment in the case of Muthoot Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. [2015 (3) TMI 634 (Ker.-HC)] and in the case of M/s A.M. Motors Vs. Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise, Kozhikode [2015 (6) TMI-162-Kerala-High Court] , mandatory pre-deposit is not required because lis in question commenced prior to the introduction of the amended Section 35F ibid and therefore the appeal should be dealt with....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tions of both sides. We find that the issue regarding requirement of mandatory pre-deposit in respect of the appeals filed on or after 06.08.2014 has been settled by CESTAT in the case of MTNL Vs. CST, Delhi vide its dated 08.06.2016, wherein it has been held that such appeals are required to be accompanied with mandatory pre-deposit as per the amended Section 35F ibid. In the said order, the judgements of Kerala and Andhra Pradesh High Courts and the judgement of Supreme Court in the case of Hoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (supra) cited by the appellant were duly taken note of while arriving at the decision contained therein. 5. As regards the contention that in the wake of the judgements of Kerala and Andhra....