Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (11) TMI 257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and act as a broker in arranging sale of the imported cars. Intelligence was received by DRI Mumbai Zonal unit which indicated that Shri Roshan Somjee of Pune possessed one Toyota Prado Vehicle imported into India by mis-declaration under the Transfer of Residence Scheme. Pursuant to said information, inquires were made and it was further gathered that the Toyota Prado was imported by Shri Mohammed Haneef Husain in December 2003 at Mumbai Port by mis-declaring the model code of the vehicle and year of manufacture as 1998, whereas, the vehicle was actually of a higher model. In January 2004, Shri Mohammad Haneef Husain had approached the appellant and had showed his desire to sell the vehicle for a good price; Appellant had prepared necessa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at allegation of violation of post import condition is erroneous as the lower authorities have failed to notice that the subject car was registered in name of Roshan Somjee only, after 2 years of its importation. Therefore there is no violation of post import condition. 4.2 Further it is stated that 'NO SALE' condition, within 2 years of importation of the subject car, is required to be adhered and complied by the importer and not by the appellant neither it is alleged in SCN that the appellant has not completed the importer to sell the car nor the Ld Add Commissioner has arrived at such a conclusion. 4.3 Further the learned counsel submits that the allegation on appellant of abetting in the offence does not arise, as the importer had....