Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 1957

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Alok Srivastava, Dy. Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER Under this Stay application, appellant is seeking staying the operation of Order-in-Original No. DMN-EXCUS-000-COM-033-13-14, dated 27-2-2014, under which Cenvat credit of Rs. 72,13,884/- has been disallowed to the appellant along with interest, and an equivalent amount of penalty has a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p;  Tecumseh Products India Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Hyderabad - 2010 (256) E.L.T. 276 (Tri.-Bang.) (iii)   CCE v. MDS Swichgear Ltd. - 2008 (229) E.L.T. 485 (S.C.). 3. It was also the case of the appellant that duty demand, if any, for misuse of advance licencing conditions can be raised only on DIPL Unit-I/ Unit-II. 4. Shri Alok Srivastava (AR) appearing on behalf of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e fact that no duty was paid with respect to the raw materials used in the manufacture of the finished goods received by the appellant. On the other hand, appellant has strongly contested the selling of raw materials on high sea sale basis to DIPL (Unit-I) does not mean that appellant had the knowledge that the same goods will be used in the manufacture of finished goods supplied to them on paymen....