Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 1947

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri M.S. Negi, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER After hearing both the sides, I find that the appellant are engaged in the manufacture of MS Pipes/G.I. Pipes falling under Chapter Heading 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Their factory was visited by the Preventive Officers on 8-12-2007, who conducted physical stock taking of the finished goods as well as Cenvatable raw materials. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d only on the shortages detected at the time of visit of the officers as also statement of the Director. Whether the charges of clandestine removal can be upheld on the shortages so detected stand considered by the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Raj Ratan Industries Ltd. v. CCE, Kanpur [2013 (289) E.L.T. 482 (Tri.-Del.)] as also in the case of CCE, Meerut-I v. Silvertone Papers Ltd. [2013 (287) E.L.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... intent to avoid payment of tax to cause him prejudice.". As such the Revenue's sole reliance on the statement of Director, without their being any other evidence to reflect upon clandestine activities especially when the factum of actual weighment is also in doubt, cannot be appreciated. 5. Further, the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Tejwal Dyestuff Industries v. CCE, Ahmedabad [2007 (216) ....