Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 1655

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the penalty under Section 11AC of Act imposed on the appellant. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of forged, rolls, gears, shafts and cranks. They procured one purchase order from M/s. Mid India Power & Steel Ltd. for supply of these goods against EPCG lice....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to the appellant for appropriation of duty along with interest already paid and for imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Act. The adjudicating authority considering the facts that on pointing out by the department, the appellant has paid duty along with interest. Therefore, as per provisions of Section 11A(2B) of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Board's Circular No. 137/167/2006-CX-04....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se circumstances, when they have paid duty along with interest on pointing out by the department, show cause notice was not required to be issued. Consequently, the penalty is not imposable on the appellant. 5. On the other hand, learned AR opposes the contention of the learned Counsel for the appellant that the appellant are clearing the goods by claiming exemption but they have not disclos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....owing clearance against EPCG licence. But it is admitted fact that the appellant has not disclosed that under which notification they are claiming exemption and were not paying duty. As the appellant is filing ER-1 return regularly showing clearance against EPCG licence and not disclosed that under which notification number they are claiming exemption, burden of proof cast on the Revenue to ask th....