Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 1604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this appeal of assessee is against the order of CIT(A) confirming the action of AO in disallowing the expenses of Research & Development. For this, assessee has raised following three grounds: "1. For that under the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. Assessing Authority and the Ld. Appellate Authority failed and neglected to appreciate the facts and nature of business carried on by the petitioner company and the entire observations in respect to such disallowance of expenses which arises out of Research & Development work of oneequipment for control of vehicle pollution, is bad in law and liable to be quashed. 2. For that the Ld. Appellate Authority as well as the Ld Assessing Authority should have appreciated that the petitioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mission put forward by the appellant along with the supporting documents furnished, perused the facts of the case including the finding of the AO in the impugned assessment order and the other materials brought on record. I have also gone through the contents of the various correspondences made by the appellant with the Transport Department, Govt. of West Bengal and with ARAI and the nature of Proforma Invoice for advance payment made. I do not find any substantial force in the argument put forward by the appellant. On the other hand I do find convincing reasoning in the observation of the AO that the project expenses written off were incurred by the appellant in past years in connection with the testing of Multi Fuel System by Automotive R....