2015 (10) TMI 1596

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Varkey, AM This appeal filed by the Assessee, arises out of the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XXX, New Delhi dated 6.7.2012 pertaining to assessment year 2009-10 and raised the following grounds:- 1) That the learned CIT (Appeals) has erred in passing the order uls 250 of the Act in the instant case without allowing any opportunity of hearing to the appellate assessee. That the learned CIT....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....terest amounting to Rs. 15,06,0801- levied by the Assessing Officer uls 201(1A) of the Act. 6) That the appellant craves the right to amend, append, delete any or all grounds of appeal. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee has filed e- TDS statement and correction statement(s) if any. The TDS statement was analyzed by AO on the basis of entries reported by the deduct....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....period of filing the 'correction statements' are as per the justification report which forms Annexure 'A' of his order. And in view of the defaults as per Annexure 'A', the deductor (assesses) was declared to be an 'assessee in default' and the AO assessed accordingly. The deductor (assessee) was directed to pay the total tax liability of Rs. 15,06,080 vide order dated 28.3.2011 passed u/s. 201(1)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s issued nor any date of hearing was fixed by the Ld. CIT(A), so nobody could represent the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A), which is against natural justice. 6. On the other hand, Ld. DR has relied upon the order of the AO. 6.1 We find that in para 3 of the impugned order the Ld. CIT(A), states "when the AO(TDS) is unable to apply his mind or have no access to NSDL site, what the CIT(A) can ....