2015 (10) TMI 1477

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ricting to Rs. 6,30,000/- out of total addition of Rs. 21,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of notional rent from farm house. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law in admitting additional evidence in violation of Rule 46A of the I.T. Rule, 1961. 3. The order of the CIT(A) is erroneous and is not tenable on facts and in law. 4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend any / all of the grounds of appeal before or during the course of the hearing of the appeal. 3. The assessee is an individual, filed his return of income on 31.10.2007 declaring total income of Rs. 33,08,170/-. The assessment u/s. 143(3) of the I.T. Act was completed on 31.12.2009 fixing the total ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s not liable to be assessed under the head "income from house property" on the aforesaid Farm House, since it is an agricultural property. Ld. CIT(A) also rejected the assessee's contention that the above-said property is not registered in the name of the assessee. Ld. CIT(A), however, accepted the additional evidences with reference to the valuation of the property being Annual Letting Value (ALV) fixed by the Municipal Corporation as on 1.12.2005. The Ld. CIT(A) in the course of appellate proceedings had called for the Remand Report from the Assessing Officer and on receipt of the same, accepted the notional rent @ Rs. 75,000/- per month, being the ALV fixed by the Municipal Corporation. 6. The Revenue being aggrieved is in Appeal befo....